FW: Proposal: safeEval

[doodad-js Admin]

This is silly.  I can want these without wanting them built using substandard tools.

 

That’s the point why I bring it to ES. Nothing on the “user land” can provide something reliable, apart a complete JS runtime library compiled to “WASM” or “asm.js”. And... that’s silly.

 

 

From: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:04 PM
To: doodad-js Admin <doodadjs at gmail.com>
Cc: Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com>; es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: FW: Proposal: safeEval

 

 

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 5:30 PM doodad-js Admin <doodadjs at gmail.com <mailto:doodadjs at gmail.com> > wrote:

“Blacklisting or whitelisting, that’s an open discussion”: It really isn't.

 

So for you, blacklisting or whitelisting is not opened to a discussion?

No.

Case based reasoning doesn't work when the partition of cases can't be enumerated so if we want confidence in our tools we ought prefer whitelisting.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180622/6396211d/attachment.html>