Proposal static type constraints features

Jordan Harband ljharb at
Mon Jun 4 06:01:13 UTC 2018

The default alternative is "neither" - I think something as fundamental as
type annotations would need to have intuitive and conflict-free syntax, and
absolutely would have a way to work cross-realm with both objects and
primitives, to both distinguish between them and to allow both (in the case
of primitives other than null/undefined).

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:50 PM, YU HengChun <achun.shx at> wrote:

> Or enable both versions at the same time?
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list