proposal: Object Members
waldemar at google.com
Sat Jul 28 00:55:15 UTC 2018
On 07/26/2018 01:55 PM, Ranando King wrote:
> I've just finished updating my proposal with an [Existing proposals](https://github.com/rdking/proposal-object-members/blob/master/README.md#existing-proposals) section that lists the major differences.
Reading the proposal, I'm not yet sure what it's supposed to do. Some things I've noticed:
- The proposal commingles static and instance private properties. In the first example, you could read or write this#.field2, and it would work. How would you encode the generic expression a#.[b]?
- Worse, the proposal commingles all private properties across all classes. There's nothing in the proposed code stopping you from reading and writing private properties defined by class A on instances of an unrelated class B.
More information about the es-discuss