javascript vision thing

Richard Gibson richard.gibson at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 22:34:17 UTC 2018


As stated even more strongly in ECMA-404:
>
> Because it is so simple, it is not expected that the JSON grammar will
> ever change. This gives JSON, as a foundational notation, tremendous
> stability.


On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:43 AM Jordan Harband <ljharb at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's a ridiculous claim, considering JSON has never supported functions,
> or `undefined`, or RegExps, or Dates.
>
> ES6 also introduced `Symbol`, `Map`, `Set`, etc all of which have no JSON
> representation.
>
> There's no "limbo" - JSON is, and will forever be, a subset of JS. Many
> new things will be added to JS, and *none* of them will likely ever be
> added to JSON at this point.
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Anders Rundgren <
> anders.rundgren.net at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-07-26 17:24, Ranando King wrote:
>>
>>> JSON = JavaScript Object Notation
>>>
>>
>> This obviously broke down when tc39 introduced BigInt leaving the JSON/JS
>> community in limbo.
>>
>> Anders
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180727/2784a69e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list