proposal: Object Members
kingmph at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 20:55:28 UTC 2018
I've just finished updating my proposal with an [Existing proposals](
section that lists the major differences.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM Ranando King <kingmph at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the advice. Those will be the next updates I make to the
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:32 AM T.J. Crowder <
> tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Ranando King <kingmph at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Let me see if I can clarify things a bit:
>> Thanks! That does indeed clear things up a lot.
>> I'd find it helpful (just speaking for myself here) if the proposal
>> opened with a series of specific differences with the two existing
>> proposals and statements of why your way is better. (If it refers to
>> existing issues raised on their repos, links are great with a summary of
>> where you think the issue stands.) You've made a few statements along those
>> lines in that list, but if you could flesh it out in the proposal, that
>> would be really helpful.
>> -- T.J. Crowder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss