proposal: Object Members

Ranando King kingmph at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 14:00:27 UTC 2018


Thank you for the advice. Those will be the next updates I make to the
proposal.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:32 AM T.J. Crowder <
tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Ranando King <kingmph at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let me see if I can clarify things a bit:
>
> Thanks! That does indeed clear things up a lot.
>
> I'd find it helpful (just speaking for myself here) if the proposal opened
> with a series of specific differences with the two existing proposals and
> statements of why your way is better. (If it refers to existing issues
> raised on their repos, links are great with a summary of where you think
> the issue stands.) You've made a few statements along those lines in that
> list, but if you could flesh it out in the proposal, that would be really
> helpful.
>
> -- T.J. Crowder
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180726/df6b0e8e/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list