Feature proposal

Isiah Meadows isiahmeadows at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 08:49:20 UTC 2018

What about this alternate proposal:


(I've got a myriad of other related stuff there, too.)

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 04:41 Dmitry Shulgin <shulhindvst at gmail.com> wrote:

> Above we was talking about this.
> consistency and handy using -- two main reasons for this proposal.
> `reverse` will also mutate my array, cause of in-place implementation.
> You can find workaround for many existing methods, but it's not handy to
> my mind.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180719/273d5200/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list