andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 14:49:48 UTC 2018
just a few days ago another full stack JS dev mentioned Array replace and
it has nothing to do with what was proposed in here:
My TL;DR response was that once the pipe operator is in, everyone can bring
in its own meaning for `array |> replace` and call it a day.
Keep polluting the already most polluted prototype of them all doesn't look
like a good strategy to improve the language.
Just my 2 cents.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:37 PM T.J. Crowder <
tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Ben Wiley <therealbenwiley at gmail.com>
> > Hm, despite the fewer number of points in the cons category I'm
> persuaded by
> > the argument that we don't want people getting arrays and objects
> > Might be best to limit that until there is a compelling use case which
> > might not be.
> Heh, whereas despite having written that first bullet in the footgun
> column somewhat forcefully (looking back), I go the other way. :-)
> -- T.J. Crowder
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss