raul.mihaila at gmail.com
Sun Feb 25 09:54:01 UTC 2018
I made the PR on the ecma repo so that the diff is smaller (since I'm
touching more sections than the proposal repo had).
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Jordan Harband <ljharb at gmail.com> wrote:
> Simply theorizing about how it might be done - without an actual spec diff
> (this email might be close but I can't personally reason about it) - isn't
> going to achieve much, unfortunately.
> However, if you'd like to make a PR to the proposal repo, I'd be happy to
> review it. If it seems possible, and if it passes the test suites, I'd be
> happy to make the corresponding PR to the actual spec and test262.
> (as for "waiting a year", ES is a living standard; there's no need to wait
> that long. If a change is presented that results in fewer observable calls
> without violating any of the criteria that led to the current spec, I
> suspect the committee and implementors would be more than happy to see the
> change go in ASAP)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss