Proposal to add symbol: "hasInstanceStrict"

kai zhu kaizhu256 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 08:59:19 UTC 2018


@T.J., no respectable employer would hire an expensive, competent javascript-programmer, if they didn’t have the intention of leveraging him/her to write integration-code interfacing with some kind of web-ui.  otherwise, it makes more business-sense to hire cheaper and more-plentiful competent java-programmers.

> On Feb 20, 2018, at 3:47 PM, T.J. Crowder <tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:34 AM, kai zhu <kaizhu256 at gmail.com <mailto:kaizhu256 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > @aleksander, javascript was not designed to validate functions and
> > class-instances passed around inside a silo'd nodejs-process.  its
> > designed to solve UX-problems
> 
> Again: This myth is false. It doesn't matter how often you repeat it, it remains false. JavaScript is a general-purpose programming language just like any of several other general-purpose programming languages, your attempts to relegate it to the browser notwithstanding.
> 
> -- T.J. Crowder

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180220/7e1087c2/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list