Proposal to add symbol: "hasInstanceStrict"

Aleksander Efremov mr.efrem at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 03:05:56 UTC 2018


And still one question about `function decorators` . They will be work if
in function parameters uses destructuring?

```
@rttc(PrimitiveNumber, PrimitiveString, PrimitiveBoolean)
function a (b, { c, d }) {}
```

20 февр. 2018 г. 0:13 пользователь "mr.efrem" <mr.efrem at gmail.com> написал:

> And still one question about `function decorators` . They will be work if
> in function parameters uses destructuring?
> ```
> @rttc(PrimitiveNumber, PrimitiveString, PrimitiveBoolean)
> function a (b, { c, d }) {}
> ```
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Исходное сообщение --------
> От: "T.J. Crowder" <tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com>
> Время: пн 19/2 20:58
> Кому: Aleksander Efremov <mr.efrem at gmail.com>
> Копия: es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org>
> Тема: Re: Proposal to add symbol: "hasInstanceStrict"
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Aleksander Efremov <mr.efrem at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In my first example you can found what I mean.
>
> Yes, I looked at your first example (and every other example in the
> thread) before replying. As it had nothing to do with `fetch`, but you
> specifically mentioned `fetch` in your message, I assumed you were asking
> something about `fetch`. If you were talking about the `const` in `const c:
> PrimitiveNumber = sum(1, 2);`, why say "`fetch`"?
>
> -- T.J. Crowder
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180220/0148e18c/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list