dimtimeforever at gmail.com
Sat Feb 17 05:43:37 UTC 2018
"You can just call an async method from the constructor (without await) -
and then let that async method handle all the asynchronicity."
Not sure about it - how control? callback?
I prefer async/await then.
"I think async constructor would make more sense than async class"
Maybe: i use it for class more for difference between class and async class
was more visible.
But yes in total idea about async constructor.
Both variants work for me.
What more useful - i dont sure...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss