petter.envall at gmail.com
Sun Dec 2 20:25:12 UTC 2018
I just want to make it perfectly clear to everyone that neither I am a
member of TC39
On 2 December 2018 09:31:23 Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:
> For one token (+ an import) more, you could use decorators instead.
> And BTW, it's been suggested already that a standard decorator library
> should exist, just IIUC (I'm not part of TC39) it's not yet determined
> what should be in it.
> Isiah Meadows
> contact at isiahmeadows.com
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 2:25 AM Jacob Pratt <jhprattdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm of the opinion this is what decorators are for.
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 01:49 Ranando King <kingmph at gmail.com wrote:
>>> Since some form of data is going to land in ES class syntax, it would be a
>>> good idea if the capabilities of a property descriptor were also exposed
>>> for all public properties.
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss