New: proposal-common-member-modifiers

[Petter Envall]

I just want to make it perfectly clear to everyone that neither I am a 
member of TC39

Best regards
/p

On 2 December 2018 09:31:23 Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:

> For one token (+ an import) more, you could use decorators instead.
> And BTW, it's been suggested already that a standard decorator library
> should exist, just IIUC (I'm not part of TC39) it's not yet determined
> what should be in it.
>
> -----
>
> Isiah Meadows
> contact at isiahmeadows.com
> www.isiahmeadows.com
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 2:25 AM Jacob Pratt <jhprattdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm of the opinion this is what decorators are for.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 01:49 Ranando King <kingmph at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Since some form of data is going to land in ES class syntax, it would be a 
>>> good idea if the capabilities of a property descriptor were also exposed 
>>> for all public properties.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/rdking/proposal-common-member-modifiers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss