[strawman] Symbol.thenable proposal

[Michael Theriot]

A hypothetical proposal addressing that would intersect with this.

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, <me at gus.host> wrote:

> I don't understand why you would expect that, can you explain a bit more?
>
> -Gus
>
> On 14 Apr 2018 10:53, Michael Theriot <michael.lee.theriot at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Currently 'then' is effectively a reserved key and I'd expect any
> extension that allows the language to ignore it likewise include a means of
> changing the key entirely.
>
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 9:33 PM, Gus Caplan <me at gus.host> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> In an effort to curtail the interesting behavior of Promise.resolve
> (especially
> with regard to dynamic import), I have created a proposal for a well-known
> symbol which will allow an object to not be treated as a "thenable."
>
> I am privy to the current protocol proposal which might be a better fit for
> this, but due to dynamic import already being stage 3, I don't feel we
> should
> wait for it to come to fruition.
>
> Comments and suggestions are of course quite welcome at the repo [1].
>
> Thanks,
> -Gus
>
> [1]: https://github.com/devsnek/proposal-symbol-thenable
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180414/be54286d/attachment.html>