Re: EcmaScript Proposal – Private methods and fields proposals.

[T.J. Crowder]

> Just an item of note: `private` *is* a valid identifier name in sloppy
> mode, so your `private(this)` and `private["foo"]` syntax won't work
> without banning it from sloppy.

`class` code is always strict[1].

-- T.J. Crowder

[1]: https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-class-definitions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180414/72fcbc3d/attachment.html>