kaizhu256 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 06:22:07 UTC 2017
in frontend-development, the majority of use-cases are for
small/medium-scale applications, where es6 toolings are inappropriate
due to their complexity.
"reliable, well-engineered, large-scale, performant applications" are
stable tooling for simple/moderate webapps), instead of catering to
niche people wanting google/facebook-scale apps.
On 10/27/17, Bob Myers <rtm at gol.com> wrote:
> If you don't like those features or the associated tooling, then don't use
> Meanwhile, other people will be using them to build reliable,
> well-engineered, large-scale, performant applications.
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM, kai zhu <kaizhu256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> language instability, which promotes tooling instability.
>> generators, es modules, destructing, let, fat arrows have caused
>> tremendous harm to tooling stability, which has made
>> frontend-development hell for everyone.
>> On 10/27/17, Jordan Harband <ljharb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > aka "how it feels to learn"?
>> > A decent response:
>> > https://medium.com/front-end-hacking/how-it-feels-to-learn-
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:38 PM, J Decker <d3ck0r at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> d3a717dd577f
>> >> It all seemed so simple....
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> es-discuss mailing list
>> >> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss