How it feels to learn JavaScript in 2016

kai zhu kaizhu256 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 05:48:10 UTC 2017


tc39 should have staggered the release of so many high-impact changes
over es6/es7/es8/etc.

es6 is essentially javascript++, like c/c++.  you can't expect senior
c programmers to trivially transition projects to c++, or for existing
c toolings to automatically extend to c++.

On 10/27/17, Mark <mark at heyimmark.com> wrote:
> kai, what do you think would've been a better alternative? (Honestly
> curious)
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:27 AM kai zhu <kaizhu256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> tc39 is partly to blame for promoting the perception of javascript
>> language instability, which promotes tooling instability.
>>
>> generators, es modules, destructing, let, fat arrows have caused
>> tremendous harm to tooling stability, which has made
>> frontend-development hell for everyone.
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/17, Jordan Harband <ljharb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > aka "how it feels to learn"?
>> >
>> > A decent response:
>> >
>> https://medium.com/front-end-hacking/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2017-a934b801fbe
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:38 PM, J Decker <d3ck0r at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> (humor?)
>> https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-
>> >> d3a717dd577f
>> >>
>> >> It all seemed so simple....
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> es-discuss mailing list
>> >> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list