rtm at gol.com
Sat Nov 18 17:53:57 UTC 2017
I'm a JS programmer with more decades of experience than I care to mention,
and follow developments in language design closely. Frankly, I don't
understand what you are trying to accomplish or why support for it needs to
be in the language. I strongly doubt I'm the only one. Rather than spending
your time tilting at TC39 windmills, I'd suggest a focus on putting
together a library which implements your vision of mixins.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă <
raul.mihaila at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com>
>> Protocols are not mixins - they're interfaces. They specify minimum
>> behavior required to implement (their primary focus), not simply extended
>> behavior. In particular, protocols and mixins would be more complementary
>> than conflicting.
> Protocols are mixins as well, take a look at this comment.
> Also, I didn't say they conflict with mixins, I said they should be
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss