Shorthand for "function" keyword

[T.J. Crowder]

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Naveen Chawla
<naveen.chwl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Who uses functions instead of arrow functions and methods these
> days, anyway? (I know, people who haven't adopted ES2015+)

Laurentiu's been fairly clear about his/her use case: Named inline
callbacks. I don't think he/she cares whether the functions are arrow
functions, so long as they have names. (Laurentiu, correct me if I'm wrong
there.) Right now, if you want to pass a *named* inline callback to
something, the simplest way is to use the `function` keyword.

(I don't agree with the suggestion, but he/she's been clear about it.)

-- T.J. Crowder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20171112/36c401d7/attachment-0001.html>