jmar777 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 11 21:35:21 UTC 2017
I'm not sure where the "don't break the web" threshold is set at (or how
that gets evaluated), but I do see a lot of matches for
"Array.prototype.remove" on GitHub, at least:
There's also an old blog post by John Resig with an example implementation (
that gave rise to any significant adoption or not.
I like the proposal in general, though - just throwing this out there in
case other names should be considered (maybe `discard`?).
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Alexander Jones <alex at weej.com> wrote:
> Small Sets could maybe be represented without the tree?
> And everything you say about SIMD could be done too when the set has a
> viable homogeneous type.
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 at 14:26, T.J. Crowder <tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.
> com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Isiah Meadows
>> <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Inline. (Hindsight, should've included this in the previous email)
>> Good deal, that's the kind of thing I was thinking would strengthen the
>> I think you may have meant to have more after *"In nearly every virtual
>> DOM library, in
>> most , the core involves..."* ? (Ignore this if the rest of that sentence
>> wasn't important.)
>> -- T.J. Crowder
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
@jmar777 <https://twitter.com/jmar777> / @j <https://stream.live/j>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss