Cancel Token proposal withdrawl

Isiah Meadows isiahmeadows at
Fri Jan 6 01:58:12 UTC 2017

I do suspect most of these will end up answered in the next meeting's
notes, though. Hopefully, they do. So on that note, I'll let this sit
for a bit longer (and probably re-ask then if it ends up not

Isiah Meadows
me at

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at> wrote:
> Okay...I may have misremembered the general reason (I thought I saw
> perf concerns stated somewhere, but I can't remember precisely where),
> but I've yet to see anything significant in the open about why they
> were so against it. That's why I'm asking what drove them against it.
> -----
> Isiah Meadows
> me at
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Domenic Denicola <d at> wrote:
>> Why do you say "regarding performance"? That seems made up with no evidence.
>> ________________________________
>> From: Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at>
>> Sent: Jan 5, 2017 20:09
>> To: es-discuss at
>> Subject: Cancel Token proposal withdrawl
>> The [latest proposal][1] has been withdrawn due to [Google
>> resistance][2] regarding performance. What concerns did they have, and
>> with what parts? It's hard to figure out what the problem is and come
>> up with ideas when it's all smoke and mirrors. And yes, I've tried
>> searching for any traces of an answer, but I've found pretty much
>> none, using multiple search engines.
>> Please, could I get some sort of idea what is actually wrong with the
>> proposal, what's driving them to be so strongly against it? :-(
>> [1]:
>> [2]:
>> -----
>> Isiah Meadows
>> me at
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at

More information about the es-discuss mailing list