Feedback on Iterable Numbers Proposal?

[kdex]

On that note, it might make more sense to add range literals.

On Sunday, February 26, 2017 8:39:28 PM CET kdex wrote:
> I like this proposal a lot!
> 
> The only thing I'd like to remark is that I can see people getting confused about the exact range that you're iterating over.
> Some languages provide constructs to include/exclude the last element in the range.
> 
> On Sunday, February 26, 2017 8:00:39 PM CET John Henry wrote:
> > Howdy!,
> > 
> > My name is John and I have a (hopefully non-contentious) addition for the
> > ECMA Script Language described here:
> > https://github.com/johnhenry/make-numbers-iterable. I wonder if there are
> > good folks out there willing to give me feedback? I also wonder if someone
> > might be willing to champion the proposal as described here:
> > https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -- John
> > 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170226/8f5ec4b6/attachment.sig>