Short Comparing proposal
Felipe Nascimento de Moura
felipenmoura at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 16:27:24 UTC 2017
Hi.
I wonder if there is already a proposal for such thing or if it would be
something interesting to be proposal:
*The motivation:*
Let's say you have an object whose property you want to compare to 'a' or
'b':
```
if (object.property.secondProp === 'a' || object.property.secondProp ===
'b') {
// do something
}
```
*The proposal:*
Now, with this syntax you would be able to perform such comparisons in a
much simpler, better to read approach:
```
if (object.property.secondProp === ('a' : 'b')) {
// do Something
}
```
And with the advance of the Optional Chaining Operator
<https://github.com/claudepache/es-optional-chaining> proposal, it would
get even better, like so:
```
// this:
if (object &&
object.property &&
(object.property.secondProp === 'a' ||
object.property.secondProp === 'b')) {
// ...
}
// becomes this:
if (object?.property?.secondProp === ('a' : 'b')) { ... }
```
*Alternatives:*
I do know that we could accomplish that with other techniques, like:
```
['a', 'b'].includes(object.property.secondProp)
```
I just think it might be counterintuitive and having a syntax for a "short
comparing" would be better for reading and understanding.
Would make ternary comparison even shorter, too:
```
let currentState = object.property.status === ('fail' : 'ok') ? 'done' :
'doing'
```
Please let me hear your thoughts on that :)
Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170201/558a38a5/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list