Partial Expression proposal
mikesamuel at gmail.com
Wed Dec 27 19:09:44 UTC 2017
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Tamás Halasi <trusted.tomato at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's like the functional application proposal, just for any expression. It
> would improve
This sentence ends abruptly. What would this proposal improve?
> See the proposal:
> What are your thoughts?
Is this lambdas with De Bruijn indices?
The proposal says
"""The ? token is used in conditional expressions, but its not
ambiguous, because in this proposal, a ? cannot follow an expression,
while in a conditional expression it always does."""
You have ?? and ??? for referring to outer layers. Is there no ambiguity there?
? ? ? : ?
may not be ambiguous, but without the spaces it would require
lookahead to the ":" to resolve ambiguity,
unless the tokenizer starts to consume maximal runs of question marks.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss