async/await -> await/async: a simpler, less error-prone async syntax
naveen.chwl at gmail.com
Thu Dec 7 15:18:28 UTC 2017
You've lost me. It's not intended to add logic. It's a replacement for
callbacks, and makes expressing async data flows simpler & more manageable,
allowing more complex async data flows to be expressed more quickly and be
less prone to bugs. The `autoasync` `background` concept makes this even
more so. Retaining all the functionality, increasing rate of productivity.
That's the whole point.
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 at 20:36 Florian Bösch <pyalot at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Naveen Chawla <naveen.chwl at gmail.com>
>> How has using async await made you type more? Can you give an example? I
>> suspect you're not using it in the way it was intended to be
> See example OP pasted. It's nothing but async/await. It doesn't add any
> semantic, syntactic or logic thing to the code. It could be 4 white-spaces
> and you'd not loose any meaning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss