allen at wirfs-brock.com
Tue Aug 29 15:56:55 UTC 2017
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Sebastian Malton <sebastian at malton.name> wrote:
> The outcome of this basically means "return from current context up one level and then return from there”.
This would be a terrible violation of functional encapsulation. How do you know that the (e.g.) forOf function isn’t internally using a encapsulated helper function that is making the actual call to the call back. You simply have no way to predict where returning from the current context “up one” means.
> A current method of doing this is by using try / catch but it is not ideal. Using the above method I believe that it would be able to be better optimized.
This technique provides a meaningful semantics because it allows the controlling outer function to define what early return means.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss