Array.prototype.toObjectByProperty( element=>element.property )
tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com
Tue Aug 8 08:46:20 UTC 2017
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Naveen Chawla <naveen.chwl at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to propose an enhancement to my proposal:
> It offers the same functionality, but in addition a second
> optional parameter for the "value" in case you want something
> other than the array element as the value. By default, if the
> second parameter isn't populated, it should use the array
> element itself, like the example call redundantly passes.
This is part of why Darien's proposal and my suggestion from [my first
reply in this thread] are complementary: That's exactly what you get
with Darien's, by returning `[key, value]`. Conflating them makes each of
them unnecessarily complicated in my view.
-- T.J. Crowder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss