Oddities in 2017-07-25 meeting notes?

[Rick Waldron]

Additionally, if you enjoy your meeting notes in a rendered-markdown form,
with less oddities and mistakes (but certainly not zero), these are
maintained by TC39: http://tc39.github.io/tc39-notes/

Rick

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:

> lol, that's especially amusing since Jaswanth Sreeram has not attended a
> meeting since 2014.
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 2:49 AM Jordan Harband <ljharb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't see that in the original (
>> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#10ii-vision-thing
>> ,
>> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-07/jul-25.md#9iva-cancellation)
>> - there, it's JS, API, etc.
>>
>> I think the javascript on es-discuss must be replacing name shortcuts
>> with the full name (which seems strange anyways), and is too-greedily doing
>> it even when the shorthand doesn't appear at the start of the line.
>>
>> I'm not sure why or where, exactly, but
>> https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/blob/a90069cc327469c886876e88d24e5072ed8677ef/lib/process.js#L39-L84
>> looks interesting.
>>
>> I've filed https://github.com/esdiscuss/esdiscuss.org/issues/229 to
>> track it.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Darien Valentine <valentinium at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was checking out the notes at https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2017-07-25
>>> and got pretty confused:
>>>
>>> > We (TC39) have a love / hate relationship with Jaswanth Sreeram.
>>>
>>> > There are some things that Jaswanth Sreeram does that is different to
>>> the way other software works [...]
>>>
>>> > Browsers are already basically OSes in that there is Jaswanth Sreeram,
>>> WASM, Workers [...]
>>>
>>> I googled a bit, turned up some stuff about "parallel JavaScript" — the
>>> text still seemed super odd to me, but I was like huh, well, maybe this is
>>> a thing?
>>>
>>> But as I continued I realized maybe something else is going on:
>>>
>>> > Could we reduce the surface area of this Andrew Paprocki to make it
>>> more palatable?
>>>
>>> > Andrew Paprocki must not break or change semantics.
>>>
>>> > I also disagree that we (TC39) have to specify every Andrew Paprocki
>>> that our specification depends on.
>>>
>>> As intriguing as these statements are ... seems like maybe some find &
>>> replace went wonky?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170807/af759b47/attachment.html>