an operator for ignoring any exceptions
Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalmage at gmail.com
Wed Aug 2 12:06:02 UTC 2017
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:45 AM, T.J. Crowder
<tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Sheng TIAN <llltgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there any proposal for an one unary operator for ignoring any
>> (I have not search out any related threads. But it is useful IMO,
>> so I'm wondering if this had been discussed.)
> In general, a thorough search before posting is your best course.
> To the idea: I join the chorus saying that making it easy to ignore errors
> is generally not a good idea. And reusing `try` for something that
> suppresses exceptions implicitly is separately not a good idea in my view.
Agree. Note that the similar operator (`try!(...)`) in Rust does not
*suppress* errors, but rather just simplifies handling of the error
(in Rust, expressed using a Result object); if an error is returned it
immediately returns from the outer function with the Result object;
otherwise it evaluates to the (unwrapped from the Result object)
success value. This is closer to the try expression you bring up,
just with some slightly more opinionated handling.
More information about the es-discuss