allen at wirfs-brock.com
Sun Apr 16 18:12:44 UTC 2017
On Apr 16, 2017, 9:36 AM, at 9:36 AM, "Herby Vojčík" <herby at mailbox.sk> wrote:
>Ryan Birmingham wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I frequently find myself desiring a short array or generator
>> comprehension syntax. I'm aware that there are functional ways around
>> use of comprehension syntax, but I personally (at least) love the
>> in the ES reference
>> The best previous discussion on this that I found was six years old
>> (https://esdiscuss.org/topic/array-comprehensions-shorter-syntax) and
>> answers some of my questions, raising others. That said, I wanted to
>> * Why is the Comprehension Syntax in the reference yet not more
>> standard? It feels almost like a tease.
>IIRC, it was discussed here throroughly for ES6 (~2yrs ago?) and it was
>rejected in favour of .map/.filter/arrays fns.
>> * How do you usually approach or avoid this issue?
>> * Do you think we should look at improving and standardizing the
>> comprehension syntax?
>> Thank you all for humoring me,
>> -Ryan Birmingham
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>es-discuss mailing list
>es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss