herby at mailbox.sk
Sun Apr 16 16:36:00 UTC 2017
Ryan Birmingham wrote:
> Hello all,
> I frequently find myself desiring a short array or generator
> comprehension syntax. I'm aware that there are functional ways around
> use of comprehension syntax, but I personally (at least) love the syntax
> in the ES reference
> The best previous discussion on this that I found was six years old
> (https://esdiscuss.org/topic/array-comprehensions-shorter-syntax) and
> answers some of my questions, raising others. That said, I wanted to ask:
> * Why is the Comprehension Syntax in the reference yet not more
> standard? It feels almost like a tease.
IIRC, it was discussed here throroughly for ES6 (~2yrs ago?) and it was
rejected in favour of .map/.filter/arrays fns.
> * How do you usually approach or avoid this issue?
> * Do you think we should look at improving and standardizing the
> comprehension syntax?
> Thank you all for humoring me,
> -Ryan Birmingham
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss