Strict Relational Operators
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 11 23:46:01 UTC 2017
It's definitely an interesting idea... Been trying to consider what
character would be added to represent a strict comparison... Perhaps @?
>@ <@ <=@ >=@ ...
Not sure how this might conflict with decorators...
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1 at gmail.com - http://tracker1.info
Please excuse grammar errors and typos, as this message was sent from my
On Apr 10, 2017 9:48 AM, "Isiah Meadows" <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure there has been prior discussion. A lot of stuff has
> already been discussed in depth, but that I don't think is one of
> Isiah Meadows
> me at isiahmeadows.com
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:47 AM, T.J. Crowder
> <tj.crowder at farsightsoftware.com> wrote:
> > I'm sure there must have been discussions of adding strict relational
> > operators (e.g., non-coercing ones, the `===` versions of `<`, `>`, `<=`,
> > and `>=`), but I'm not having a lot of luck finding those discussions.
> > Searching "strict relational
> > site:https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/" and on
> > doesn't turn up anything relevant.
> > Does anyone have a link handy? I'm not trying to start a new discussion,
> > just keen to read what's already been discussed.
> > Thanks,
> > -- T.J. Crowder
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss