nison.mael at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 23:54:40 UTC 2016
JSON.parse() and object literals are big sources of objects-as-maps. In
both of these cases, using the `in` operator won't give the right answer.
Le mar. 6 sept. 2016 à 22:11, Domenic Denicola <d at domenic.me> a écrit :
> Reflect is a namespace that contains the proxy traps (it’s a bit of an
> unfortunate name), so we shouldn’t be adding things to it that are not part
> of the meta-object protocol.
> A new namespace, or using Object, might be OK. I think that it will still
> be controversial, since this proposal is in support of an objects-as-maps
> programming style which has caused many problems in the past and should not
> be encouraged. See e.g.
> If you are using objects-as-maps safely, you’d use Object.create(null), in
> which case the `in` operator works fine and there's no need for
> hasOwnProperty incantations.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss