Reflect.create()

even stensberg evenstensberg at gmail.com
Fri May 27 04:40:12 UTC 2016


I've refactored the project, more yet to come, but have a look:
https://github.com/ev1stensberg/proposal-reflect-or. Still need to put up
an example and implementation details ( currently on the to-do list)

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:33 AM, G. Kay Lee <
balancetraveller+es-discuss at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Even,
>
> I think everyone who has replied above has all been offering some very
> constructive feedbacks for you to chew on. The key takeway, if you haven't
> noticed already, is that your understanding of the language is flawed, and
> people simply cannot help you or continue their discussions with you
> because of that.
>
> We're here to discuss really technical things and every tiniest detail has
> the need to be clarified, but that doesn't mean we're being harsh at you.
> However, you need to bring your knowledge of the language up to a certain
> level before jumping into the water. This is something only you can help
> yourself.
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, even stensberg <evenstensberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is there anything bad about getting feedback before reiteration? This was
>> meant for having some feedback and improvements. If you got some input, you
>> are free to join by submitting a issue on GitHub!
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Renki Ivanko <fatalis.erratum at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Everything about this is confusing; you should slow down and think
>>> things through more.
>>>
>>> R.
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:25 AM, even stensberg <evenstensberg at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's one of the reasons why GitHub is a better place to discuss this
>>>> ;)
>>>>
>>>> As I tried to say, this is work in progress, meaning I'd like input on
>>>> this as well as improvements on the actual proposal.
>>>>
>>>> As by last line, what is it that you don't understand? Hit me up at
>>>> GitHub and I'll try to clear things up.
>>>>
>>>> For future discussions, I'd like to keep things such as this on GitHub,
>>>> so if you got any replies you want to take, do it there.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bergi <a.d.bergi at web.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> … was bad typed by me there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed it was.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to explain why I
>>>>>> mean that this isn't a real object by saying that it doesn't contain
>>>>>> prototype or constructor and thereby people got the analogy. Often
>>>>>> when I
>>>>>> say things are not things, as by object is not objects, I assume
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> manage to reason without having to pin facts straight into their
>>>>>> faces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but this approach isn't going to work on this mailing list here
>>>>> or when you are going to write a technical document like a spec proposal.
>>>>> Don't talk in (bad) metaphors, state facts and use precise language.
>>>>>
>>>>> We still don't understand how your `Reflect.create` is supposed to
>>>>> work or be implemented, how it is different from the old approach, and what
>>>>> exactly its advantage(s) will be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>  Bergi
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160527/1d8403e1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list