A plan to help TC39 become more open up to community contributions and participations

Isiah Meadows isiahmeadows at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 20:43:29 UTC 2016

Didn't know that. Nice to know! :-)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, 11:48 Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:

> On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just an educated guess (I'm not actually involved in any part of this
> effort - just a random person subscribed to this list), but I think it's
> because of ECMA itself. Granted, TC39 has already noted that this one
> doesn't exactly fit well with the rest of their framework, because of the
> constant and frequent input, and because the software industry moves a lot
> faster than the hardware and electrical engineering industries (that's most
> of what ECMA deals with).
> Note that Ecma has a long history of developing software related
> standards. In fact the second standard issued by Ecma was for a programming
> language.
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Standardwithdrawn.htm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160615/d0077de7/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list