Oddly accepted RegExps

Boris Zbarsky bzbarsky at mit.edu
Fri Jun 3 13:20:11 UTC 2016

On 6/3/16 4:20 AM, Isiah Meadows wrote:
> These three RegExps don't appear valid, even after reading the Annex B,
> but they do behave consistently in both Chrome and Firefox.

Note that Chrome and Firefox use the same regexp implementation, so them 
agreeing on how a regexp is handled means a lot less than if two 
independent implementations agreed.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list