Process of proposing targeted deconstruction
gardnerjohng at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 13:36:43 UTC 2016
*> There is no such thing as ES7.*
You say that as though you can control how people index language versions
in their minds...
On 1 June 2016 at 23:33, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
> ES2015 was the last version for which the short for ("ES6") was also in
> common use. After that, there is only ES2016 etc. There is no such thing as
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:03 PM, John Gardner <gardnerjohng at gmail.com>
>> I'd like to propose a simple yet potent syntax addition
>> for /ECMAScript\d+/. What's the most direct approach to get this
>> officially considered? I've seen differing procedures mentioned in places
>> and I'm unsure.
>> BTW, am I the only one getting confused by the year-based naming
>> convention? I skip over intermediate letters when reading and only absorb
>> the last digit, which makes me mistake ES2017 as ES7, which is actually
>> ES2016, which I get mixed up with ES6, which is ES2015.
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss