Process of proposing targeted deconstruction

John Gardner gardnerjohng at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 13:36:43 UTC 2016


*> There is no such thing as ES7.*

You say that as though you can control how people index language versions
in their minds...

On 1 June 2016 at 23:33, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:

> ES2015 was the last version for which the short for ("ES6") was also in
> common use. After that, there is only ES2016 etc. There is no such thing as
> ES7.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:03 PM, John Gardner <gardnerjohng at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose a simple yet potent syntax addition
>> <https://esdiscuss.org/topic/constructing-objects-from-named-identifiers>
>> for /ECMAScript\d+/. What's the most direct approach to get this
>> officially considered? I've seen differing procedures mentioned in places
>> and I'm unsure.
>>
>> BTW, am I the only one getting confused by the year-based naming
>> convention? I skip over intermediate letters when reading and only absorb
>> the last digit, which makes me mistake ES2017 as ES7, which is actually
>> ES2016, which I get mixed up with ES6, which is ES2015.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>     Cheers,
>     --MarkM
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160601/f9f5b911/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list