Process of proposing targeted deconstruction

Mark S. Miller erights at
Wed Jun 1 13:33:01 UTC 2016

ES2015 was the last version for which the short for ("ES6") was also in
common use. After that, there is only ES2016 etc. There is no such thing as

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:03 PM, John Gardner <gardnerjohng at> wrote:

> I'd like to propose a simple yet potent syntax addition
> <>
> for /ECMAScript\d+/. What's the most direct approach to get this
> officially considered? I've seen differing procedures mentioned in places
> and I'm unsure.
> BTW, am I the only one getting confused by the year-based naming
> convention? I skip over intermediate letters when reading and only absorb
> the last digit, which makes me mistake ES2017 as ES7, which is actually
> ES2016, which I get mixed up with ES6, which is ES2015.
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list