Weak Reference proposal

[Mark S. Miller]

What are the GC semantics specified for DOM? How are these observable?


On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I know this is only tangentially related, but I just remembered weak refs
> are required for a fully conforming DOM implementation because of their GC
> semantics. I feel this is relevant with the semi-recent DOM-in-JS efforts.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, 20:24 Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ecma International needs to capture a accurate historical archive  of the
>> contributions and deliberation that goes into TC39’s design decisions.  The
>> current “policy” of TC39 is that once a proposal reaches Stage 1 is MUST be
>> hosted on the TC39 github site.  However, when a proposal, like this one,
>> is actively being developed using contributions (eg, discussion) by
>> multiple TC39 members it seems like the record of that SHOULD be included
>> in the Ecma archives.  The best way to ensure that is for such discussion
>> to be hosted on the TC39 github account, even if the proposal is only at
>> stage 0.
>>
>> Allen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160216/89f3e24a/attachment-0001.html>