Weak Reference proposal
tribble at e-dean.com
Wed Feb 17 00:45:02 UTC 2016
I'm happy to do whatever is appropriate here. Is there a message I should
put in the Readme to emphasize the early stage?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of
>>>> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the
>>>> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links.
>> Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader
>> community about the future state of ecma262?
> Makes sense.
>> Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good
>> there. Case in point: https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration
> Cool! I did not know that.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss