Weak Reference proposal

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Wed Feb 17 00:38:16 UTC 2016

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of
>>> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the
>>> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links.
> Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader
> community about the future state of ecma262?

Makes sense.

> Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good
> there.  Case in point:  https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration
Cool! I did not know that.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160216/9edf4037/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list