Weak Reference proposal

Kevin Smith zenparsing at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 00:26:10 UTC 2016


>
> I have no problem with that, but do wonder, why? What is the downside of
>> proposals being on the tc39 hub starting at an earlier stage, if the
>> authors are so inclined? The upside is fewer broken links.
>>
>
Because having the tc39 "brand" on things sends a signal to the broader
community about the future state of ecma262?

Also, github forwards URLs when the repo is transferred, so we're good
there.  Case in point:  https://github.com/zenparsing/async-iteration

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160217/2add08a5/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list