Weak Reference proposal

[Mark S. Miller]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg at chromium.org>
wrote:

> I think this proposal is currently at Stage 0, right?


Right. It is stage 0.


> Do we typically
> put Stage 0 proposals on the TC39 GitHub? My understanding was that
> proposals typically get moved after Stage 2.
>

Typically yes. My assumption is that our desire here was one way -- we want
to ensure it is on the (tc39) hub once it is at stage 2. I was assuming
there was no issue in the opposite direction, i.e., that we do not actively
want to ensure that it is or is not on the hub prior to stage 2. Perhaps I
misunderstood. Is there anything about this in our process docs or prior
discussions?

Certainly, if for some reason we wish to ensure that earlier proposals are
not on the hub, it would be easy to move off, and then back on later. This
has a cost in broken links. What is the compensating benefit?



>
> Dan
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Dean Tribble <tribble at e-dean.com> wrote:
> > I have posted a stage 1 proposal for weak references in ES7 for your
> perusal
> > and feedback.
> >
> > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-weakrefs.git
> >
> > Thanks to Mark Miller and the authors of earlier proposals for help with
> the
> > document and content!  Finally thanks to a few intrepid early reviewers
> for
> > their edits, comments, and feedback.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160216/5023e53e/attachment.html>