Object Propagation Operator (was Re: Existential Operator / Null Propagation Operator)

[Isiah Meadows]

Ignore that last email...misremembered the context.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015, 06:06 Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's visually ambiguous, though. I really don't want to be reading
> `foo..bar()` and `1..toString()` in the same file. They look the same, but
> mean two completely different things.
>
> In a language that has this feature, I almost never use it, anyways,
> unless I'm interacting with the DOM. And even then, I'm not saving that
> much typing. Not with an editor with tab completion (most do).
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 19:29 Claude Pache <claude.pache at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Le 30 oct. 2015 à 00:07, Waldemar Horwat <waldemar at google.com> a écrit
>> :
>> >
>> >> On 10/29/2015 14:20, Claude Pache wrote:
>> >
>> >> In some cases – as in `3..toStrign()` –, `undefined` will be produced
>> where an error was thrown.
>> >
>> >
>> > No, this would continue to throw an error.
>>
>> Oops, you're right. So, `..` is 100% backward-compatible.
>>
>> —Claude
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20151030/2d31781f/attachment.html>