Existential Operator / Null Propagation Operator
claude.pache at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 23:29:37 UTC 2015
> Le 30 oct. 2015 à 00:07, Waldemar Horwat <waldemar at google.com> a écrit :
>> On 10/29/2015 14:20, Claude Pache wrote:
>> In some cases – as in `3..toStrign()` –, `undefined` will be produced where an error was thrown.
> No, this would continue to throw an error.
Oops, you're right. So, `..` is 100% backward-compatible.
More information about the es-discuss