Look-behind proposal in trouble

Waldemar Horwat waldemar at google.com
Tue Oct 13 19:17:19 UTC 2015

On 10/13/2015 02:18, Erik Corry wrote:
> Yes, that makes sense.
> This could be fixed by removing {n} loops from positive lookbehinds.  Or by doing the .NET-style back-references immediately.

I think it would be cleanest to do the full reverse-order matching (what I think you're calling .NET-style) from the start.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list