Look-behind proposal in trouble
Erik Corry
erik.corry at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 10:49:57 UTC 2015
Just for the lulz I ran the tests I could find from perl5 (which I think is
very similar to the proposal here) and the captures were identical when
using .Net-style reverse capturing. It's not a huge number of tests,
though.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Erik Corry <erik.corry at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Waldemar Horwat <waldemar at google.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> It's not a superset. Captures would match differently.
>
>
> Can you elaborate? How would they be different?
>
> --
> Erik Corry
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20151012/5ead311d/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list