Concise Method Binding

[Andrea Giammarchi]

Just my thoughts, I wouldn't put any self-bound thing in the class and
rather improve that `::` proposal so that whenever you `obj::method` it
creates a uniquely bound callback so that `obj::method === obj::method` and
at that point whenever you need to export, pass, or use such method you
just `obj::method` or `obj::method()` or `let method = obj::method` and
bring the pattern whenever it's needed instead of being slightly different
per each "place" (class rather than objects)

That would make it lazy, usable for events (in order to be able to also
remove them) and easily transpilable for smoother migration.

Having `class A { ::method() {} }` feels like somebody is playing too much
with the protoype or "accidentally" polluting the constructor

Regards


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:50 PM, JD Isaacks <jd at jisaacks.com> wrote:

> Andrea, Sort of. I am talking about adding an additional place where that
> operator `::` can be used -- with concise methods.
>
> Currently they cannot be used in the way I described above but I think
> there are several reasons why it makes sense.
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20151111/4488355a/attachment-0001.html>