resolve()/reject() on Promise subclasses and @@species

Boris Zbarsky bzbarsky at
Thu Nov 5 04:37:05 UTC 2015

On 11/4/15 11:22 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> see my previous message for the exact wording proposal which
> changes step 6. you mean?

I don't have a strong opinion on it, honestly.  The existence of the 
intermediate promises in all/race seems mostly to be a specification 
device to make it easier to deal with people passing in 
not-thenable-at-all values, from my point of view, so I'm not sure I 
have a principled opinion on how they should be constructed.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list