resolve()/reject() on Promise subclasses and @@species
bzbarsky at mit.edu
Thu Nov 5 04:37:05 UTC 2015
On 11/4/15 11:22 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> see my previous message for the exact wording proposal which
> changes step 6.
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/performpromiseall#content-6 you mean?
I don't have a strong opinion on it, honestly. The existence of the
intermediate promises in all/race seems mostly to be a specification
device to make it easier to deal with people passing in
not-thenable-at-all values, from my point of view, so I'm not sure I
have a principled opinion on how they should be constructed.
More information about the es-discuss