let function

[Andrea Giammarchi]

I guess 'cause that cannot be scoped, let's say in a for loop ... but yeah,
I think that's not the most needed thing in the language right now, yet
another shortcut with double reserved words one after the other

Regards

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why not use a function declaration instead?
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:37 PM Alexander Jones <alex at weej.com> wrote:
>
>> Propose adding support for
>>
>>     let function foo() {};
>>
>> which would have the equivalence of:
>>
>>     let foo = function foo() {};
>>
>> The idea is to support the normal scoping of let, but without forcing you
>> to repeat yourself when naming the function, whilst still having the
>> function's name property be set.
>>
>> This would trivially extend to const and var. Also, possibly class.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150514/ac1c5519/attachment-0001.html>